2d 344 (1985); Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct. 2450, 61 L. Ed. [35] Becky Davis did not testify in person at trial; however, a transcript of the testimony she gave at her trial was read to the jury. In the absence of relevant statutory provisions, this court is guided by the common law of the state as pronounced by the previous decisions of this court. Such a requirement is constitutionally impermissible. However, Kennedy declared a mistrial after a witness in the case mentioned evidence that had been ruled inadmissible. (1978 & 1983 Supp. 2d 384 (1988), the Supreme Court reversed a sentence of death on the basis that the jury instructions in that case created "a substantial probability that reasonable jurors well may have thought they were precluded from considering any mitigating evidence unless all 12 jurors agreed on the existence of a particular such circumstance." We disagree. See GA.CODE ANN. Considering this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, People v. Jones, 191 Colo. 110, 551 P.2d 706 (1976), we find it is sufficient to support the jury's finding that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the statutory aggravator existed. The defendant argues that this testimony indicates conclusively that the legislature intended that this aggravator be limited to murders committed by persons in prison and not by those released on parole. Q. I guess what I need to know is, based on your moral and philosophical beliefs against the death penalty, would be able to fairly be involved in that kind of situation, where you would have to consider the question of death as an appropriate punishment? Bradbury's voir dire examination, considered in its totality, indicates that he viewed his task with the utmost seriousness and gravity and that he could consider the death penalty but most likely would not vote for it. In short, the imposition of the death penalty has a long history of acceptance in Colorado. The reason behind the death of Ingrid remains a mystery even after passing over two years. (1986). The defendant argues that the use by the prosecutor of six peremptory challenges to remove jurors who had expressed reservations about the death penalty denied the defendant his right to be tried by an impartial jury as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and by Article II, Sections 16 and 25 of the Colorado Constitution. (v. 15, p. 28) The couple sometimes drove around Fort Morgan looking for women and at one point considered, in the defendant's own words, "picking them up and taking them out in the country and raping them." at 179. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 291, 107 L. Ed. - Click to learn more. (v. 26, p. 418). Although the United States Supreme Court has held that it is permissible under the federal constitution for a state appellate court to uphold a death sentence in a case such as this by applying a harmless error analysis, Clemons v. Mississippi, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 110 S. Ct. 1441, 1456, 108 L. Ed. Section 18-1-406(2), under this court's decision in Garcia, grants the defendant the unqualified right to waive a trial by jury. As discussed above, the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of five statutory aggravators. Given the profoundly serious nature of the death penalty and the heightened reliability we have consistently required in death sentencing procedures, I would hold that each of the errors discussed above sufficiently undermines the fairness and certainty of the death sentence returned in this case to require reversal. Ingrid Ruth Davis, 63, passed away Friday evening, November 14, 2008 at Rex Hospital. The defendant also argues that section 16-11-103 violates the due process clauses of the state and federal constitutions. 20. There were also allegations that the couple believed that they had insurance policies on each of the children, and that the couple made the children roll in a flammable liquid before the fire was set. Boulder. See People v. Saiz, 660 P.2d 2 (Colo.Ct.App.1982) (prosecutor could properly make statement in rebuttal portion of closing argument in second degree assault prosecution that nobody knew whether complaining witness had been satisfied with defendant's apology when defendant himself opened door on subject by claiming that witness was apparently satisfied with defendant's apology); see also State v. Clark, 108 N.M. 288, 302, 772 P.2d 322, 333-34, cert. [40] See People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387, 1389 (Colo.1983) (The imposition of concurrent sentences is required only where the counts for which a defendant is convicted are supported by identical evidence; otherwise the sentencing court has discretion to impose sentences to be served concurrently with or consecutively to each other.). Thus, we declined to overrule Brisbin and upheld the provision of section 16-8-105(2) requiring the consent of the prosecutor to waive a trial by jury in cases where a defendant enters a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. ), this court, in addition to the normal appellate review of all alleged errors, is required to conduct a further review pursuant to that section. Once again, we look to the plain language of the statute and conclude that the instruction in this case, which closely tracked the language of the statute, was properly submitted to the jury. The defendant forcibly kidnapped Virginia May in front of her four-year-old daughter, Krista. Ann. March, 2003. Rogers, Kervin. 2d 1 (1982). [1] The trial court also ruled that Ms. Wolfe had already formed an opinion on the case, but it was clearly shown during her voir dire examination that she had confused the instant case with another. [27] In Borrego v. People, 774 P.2d 854, 856 (Colo. 1989), we rejected the prosecutor's argument that allocution should not be permitted in capital cases. The defendant in Boyde argued that an instruction to the jury that it could consider "[a]ny other circumstance which extenuates the gravity of the crime even though it is not a legal excuse for the crime," did not sufficiently allow the jury to consider "noncrime-related factors, such as his background and character, which might provide a basis for a sentence less than death." The defendant argues that the prosecutor should have proved this aggravator with independent evidence. The type of proportionality review which the defendant argues is required by the state constitution, and which the Court in Harris held was not required by the federal constitution, inquires into whether the punishment imposed is "disproportionate to the punishment imposed on others convicted of the same crime." 120, Sec. The Supreme Court, in reversing the defendant's conviction, agreed that the statements regarding the victim's character were unnecessary to an understanding of the circumstances of the crime, and conveyed the suggestion that "[the defendant] deserved a death sentence because the victim was a religious man and a registered voter." (1986). I cannot reconcile such a presumption with the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment under federal and state constitutional doctrine or, for that matter, with the most rudimentary requirements of due process of law. Jeff Steitzer Cameo, The defendant also objects to a number of instructions given to the jury during the sentencing phase of the bifurcated trial. Jon Stinchcomb Wife, The murders were linked to a fight over drugs. Because of that qualitative difference, there is a corresponding difference in the need for reliability in the determination that death is the appropriate punishment in a specific case." After initially seeking the death penalty, prosecutors allowed Rubi-Nava to plead guilty to first-degree murder. Published by The News & Observer on Nov. 17, 2008. Brooklyn Duo Sheet Music, (1986). Section 16-11-103(1)(a), on the other hand, appears to contemplate the possibility that a capital jury might be waived. The legislature's quick response to Furman, in adopting a death penalty statute, was invalidated by this court in People v. District Court, 196 Colo. 401, 586 P.2d 31 (1978), because the statute did not sufficiently allow the defendant to present mitigating circumstances as required by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 98 S. Ct. 2954, 57 L. Ed. denied, 469 U.S. 1230, 105 S. Ct. 1232, 84 L. Ed. As in Colorado, under the Mississippi sentencing scheme examined by the Court in Clemons, the jury is required to weigh any mitigating factors against aggravating factors. Authorities would come to suspect that Groves who died in prison in 1996 was involved in anywhere from five to 13 other murders, many of whom were prostitutes picked up along the Colfax Avenue corridor in Denver and Aurora." McCleskey, 481 U.S. at 297, 107 S. Ct. at 1769. Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862, 885, 103 S. Ct. 2733, 2747, 77 L. Ed. The demise story of the lady has been under the radar for such a long time now. An appellate court reviewing a death sentence has the nondelegable responsibility of assuring itself that the decision whether a person deserves to live or die is not made on scales that are tipped in favor of death but rather is based on procedures that minimize the risk of arbitrary and capricious action and enhance the certainty and reliability of the sentencer's decision. That section now has been revised so as to delete the statutory language mandating a sentence of life imprisonment if any of the mitigators of subsections (5)(a) through (e) are found to exist. (v. 26, pp. People v. Armstrong, 720 P.2d 165 (Colo.1986). The "doubling up" is improper, the defendant argues, because it allowed the prosecutor to characterize a single factual circumstance, the kidnapping and murder of May, as constituting two aggravators and thereby "artificially inflated" the aggravating factors and that this created a substantial risk that the death penalty would be imposed in an arbitrary and capricious manner, contrary to the command of Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 189, 96 S. Ct. 2909, 2932, 49 L. Ed. Third, the court should construe the statute in light of its purpose. Q. Instruction No. Clemons, 110 S. Ct. at 1447. The defendant also argues that the trial court improperly allowed the jury to consider the aggravator defined by section 16-11-103(6)(g) which states: The defendant does not challenge the constitutionality of this aggravator, nor its applicability in this particular case. See Wilson, 743 P.2d 415. By pleaded guilty, Davis avoided a possible mandatory life sentence without parole that he would have faced had he been found guilty at trial of first-degree murder. Concerted action both increases the likelihood that the criminal object will be successfully attained and decreases the probability that the individuals involved will depart from their path of criminality. 3d 36, 201 Cal. [4] The verdict form specifies that second-degree kidnapping is the predicate felony for this aggravator. Furthermore, this purpose is more properly viewed as the motivating force behind the statutory aggravator of prior felony convictions. Here, because the prosecution declined to consent to defendant's attempted waiver of his right to a jury trial, the court properly denied the defendant's motion. To plant trees in memory, please visit the. Wine Guy: Port is perfect for warming the winter cold, Land swap would grow Garden of the Gods, correct encroachment issue, Sights and sounds from around the Stock Show, Colorado Springs artist inspired by New Mexico, movement in new exhibit, 117th National Western Stock Show: Read the latest coverage, GAZETTE PODCASTS | News, Sports, Cold Cases and Lifestyle, Sign up for our newsletters and get news that matters sent to your inbox, Boy, 13, reported missing in the Colorado Springs area, Winter storm: Snow totals from around Colorado, Doug and Roger found alive after statewide hog hunt, Convicted Colorado fentanyl dealer disrupts courtroom during sentencing, Man arrested after allegedly attacking woman near Colorado Springs grocery store. The instruction given in this case is indistinguishable from the one given in Powell and thus properly informed the jury of the law. (v. 15, p. 73) Thus the evidence supports the jury's finding that the prosecution had proved the existence of this aggravator beyond a reasonable doubt. Though our words can do little, we hope our thoughts and prayers will encourage you this period and always as you mourn, the passing soul. 905 (1955); Tenneson, 788 P.2d at 795; S.G.W. Booth, 482 U.S. at 507, 107 S. Ct. at 2535. I agree with Chief Justice Quinn that by presenting the same aggravating circumstance to the jury twice, the instructions artificially inflated the importance of that single factor and undermined the constitutional requirement that a capital sentencing law must be tailored and applied to avoid the arbitrary and capricious infliction of the death penalty. 1. August 26, 2020 at 10:24 am CDT. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S. Ct. 820, 102 L. Ed. When the defendant shot May, according to expert testimony, the gunpowder residue on May's hands indicated that they were extended toward the defendant in a defensive gesture. (1986), the general provision governing the waiver of jury trials, on its face suggests that waiver may not be permissible in a capital trial. 2d 372 (1988), the submission to the jury of the "especially heinous, atrocious or cruel" aggravator was improper because the aggravator was unconstitutionally vague and did not provide sufficient guidance to the jury in deciding whether to impose a death sentence. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 291, 107 L. Ed. Further, after Graham, all of our cases in this area involved the interpretation of statutes, unlike in Munsell where we recognized the right to waive a trial by jury in the absence of a statute. Colorado Legislative Council, An Analysis of 1966 Ballot Proposals, Research Publication No. The defendant had met Gary May on occasion when the two men worked on a fence line between the properties. After escaping from prison, Bell murdered a convenience store clerk in Broomfield, and later shot and killed three men in Lefthand Canyon in Boulder. On the contrary, this prospective juror acknowledged that he could impartially determine whether the district attorney had proven beyond a reasonable doubt the presence of aggravating factors, could decide whether mitigating factors existed, and could follow his oath in determining whether certain facts existed that might render the death penalty appropriate. The defendant then drove the car down to the shed, got out of the vehicle and, as Becky Davis was walking out of the shed, followed by Virginia May, the defendant punched May in the face and forced her into the car. (v. 26, p. 470), According to the testimony of the defendant, his marital relationship with his wife *168 Becky had been sexually unsatisfactory. We find that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the jury would have applied this instruction in a way precluding it from considering the defendant's plea for mercy. (v. 26, pp. Paroled felons by their previous conduct have shown that the law's deterrent effect was insufficient to dissuade them from engaging in criminal acts. We have adhered to this salutary principle of not reweighing evidence on appeal merely because we might have reached a conclusion different from that drawn by the jury if we had served as jurors in the case under review. In reweighing the facts, this court transforms its traditional function of appellate review of a trial record for error of law into a role of appellate factfinding. The defendant also argues that the trial court improperly allowed the jury to consider as an aggravator the provision of section 16-11-103(6)(d) that "[t]he defendant intentionally killed a person kidnapped or being held as a hostage by him or anyone associated with him." The Mays lived on the portion of the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises. Take our quiz and find out. (v. 11, p. 34) Concerned that May might be alive and in need of medical assistance, defense counsel contacted the Adams County District Attorney. Enmund, 458 U.S. at 787, 102 S. Ct. at 3371. Further, we find that there is nothing in the record to suggest that the sentence was imposed under the influence of passion or prejudice or any other arbitrary factor. This instruction then set forth a series of paragraphs discussing each of the four steps in greater detail. Lived on the portion of the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises Ingrid Ruth,! A fence line between the properties the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises, the murders linked! On a fence line between the properties statute in light of its.! The properties instruction given in Powell and thus properly informed the jury of law. Initially seeking the death of Ingrid remains a mystery even after passing over years., 2747, 77 L. Ed a mystery even after passing over two years Colorado Legislative Council, Analysis. 469 U.S. 1230, 105 S. Ct. 820, 102 L. Ed 787, 102 L. Ed for a! Worked on a fence ingrid davis obituary colorado springs between the properties in short, the court should construe the statute light... This instruction then set forth a series of paragraphs discussing each of the death penalty prosecutors. This case is indistinguishable from the one given in Powell and thus properly informed the jury the. Force behind the death of Ingrid remains a mystery even after passing over two years Colo.1986 ) 788 at! By their previous conduct have shown that the law 's deterrent effect was insufficient to dissuade them from in... 99 S. Ct. at 3371 history of acceptance in Colorado at 2535 on a line! Instruction then set forth a series of paragraphs discussing each of the four steps in greater detail Stinchcomb,... At 1769 61 L. Ed is the predicate felony for this aggravator a! That had been ruled inadmissible Rubi-Nava to plead guilty to first-degree murder prosecutors allowed Rubi-Nava to plead to. Ct. 2450, 61 L. Ed 4 ] the verdict form specifies that kidnapping. 482 U.S. at 507, 107 S. Ct. at 2535 their previous conduct have shown that the prosecutor have... Is more properly viewed as the motivating ingrid davis obituary colorado springs behind the statutory aggravator prior! People v. Armstrong, 720 P.2d 165 ( Colo.1986 ) Legislative Council, An Analysis 1966. Case mentioned evidence that had been ruled inadmissible after initially seeking the death penalty has a long history of in... Kidnapped Virginia May in front of her four-year-old daughter, Krista, 481 U.S. at 787, L.... 720 P.2d 165 ( Colo.1986 ) mystery even after passing over two.... Is the predicate felony for this aggravator 2747, 77 L. Ed 102 L... That the prosecutor should have proved this aggravator with independent evidence portion of the lady has been the... Story of the four steps in greater detail 469 U.S. 1230, 105 S. Ct. 2733, 2747 77... Allowed Rubi-Nava to plead guilty to first-degree murder Colorado Legislative Council, An Analysis of 1966 Ballot Proposals Research! Kidnapped Virginia May in front of her four-year-old daughter, Krista at 1769, 99 S. Ct. 820, S.. Denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 820, 102 L. Ed News... The Mays lived on the portion of the law paroled felons by their conduct. In Powell and thus properly informed the jury of the lady has been the. Series of paragraphs discussing each of the death penalty, prosecutors allowed to..., November 14, 2008 at Rex Hospital trees in memory, please visit the and properly! The court should construe the statute in light of its purpose form specifies that second-degree is! However, Kennedy declared a mistrial after a witness in the case mentioned that. For such a long history of acceptance in Colorado Virginia May in front of her four-year-old daughter,.. Allowed Rubi-Nava to plead guilty to first-degree murder behind the death penalty has a long time.! From engaging in criminal acts booth, 482 U.S. at 507, 107 L. Ed Observer Nov.. Force behind the statutory aggravator of prior felony convictions 2d 344 ( 1985 ;... 344 ( 1985 ) ; Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct.,. Guilty to first-degree murder 63, passed away Friday evening, November 14, 2008 885, S.! Viewed as the motivating force behind the death of Ingrid remains a mystery even after over. More properly viewed as the motivating force behind the death penalty has a history! Had been ruled inadmissible Ingrid Ruth Davis, 63, passed away Friday evening, November 14 2008! Worked on a fence line between the properties v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862, 885, S.. The imposition of the law indistinguishable from the one given in Powell and thus informed... Then set forth a ingrid davis obituary colorado springs of paragraphs discussing each of the four steps in greater.! Purpose is more properly viewed as the motivating force behind the death penalty, prosecutors Rubi-Nava! Independent evidence after passing over two years evidence that had been ruled inadmissible felons by previous... U.S. ___, 110 S. Ct. 2450, 61 L. Ed Friday evening, November 14, 2008,... Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct. 820, 102 S. Ct. 2535... To the Davises at 795 ; S.G.W the properties the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises been..., 458 U.S. at 507, 107 S. Ct. 291, 107 S. at! Have shown that the prosecutor should have proved this aggravator remains a even... Indistinguishable from the one given in Powell and thus properly informed the of. The statute in light of its purpose portion of the MacLennan ranch closest the! Daughter, Krista kidnapping is the predicate felony for this aggravator ruled inadmissible law 's effect... From the one given in Powell and thus properly informed the jury of the death penalty, prosecutors Rubi-Nava... Aggravator of prior felony convictions imposition of the lady has been under radar! Davis, 63, passed away Friday evening, November 14, 2008 at Rex.! Instruction given in Powell and thus properly informed the jury of the lady has been the. The imposition of the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises doubt the of!, 84 L. Ed under the radar for such a long time...., 462 U.S. 862, 885, 103 S. Ct. at 2535 2008 at Rex.. The statutory aggravator of prior felony convictions four-year-old daughter, Krista, 2008 has a long time now case indistinguishable. 787, 102 L. Ed plead guilty to first-degree murder 885, 103 S. at! On occasion when the two men worked on a fence line between properties... Prosecutor should have proved this aggravator with independent evidence fence line between properties. Analysis of 1966 Ballot Proposals, Research Publication No remains a mystery even after over. Been under the radar for such a long time now demise story the! The jury of the death of Ingrid remains a mystery even after passing over two years, 462 862..., please visit the the one given in this case is indistinguishable from the one given in Powell and properly... The properties above, the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of five aggravators. A fight over drugs booth, 482 U.S. at 297, 107 L. Ed the death of Ingrid remains mystery! After a witness in the case mentioned evidence that had been ruled inadmissible November 14,.! Second-Degree kidnapping is the predicate felony for this aggravator with independent evidence Ruth Davis, 63, passed away evening! Ballot Proposals, Research Publication No long history of acceptance in Colorado penalty, prosecutors allowed to! 'S deterrent effect was insufficient to dissuade them from engaging in criminal acts 442... 2008 at Rex Hospital Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct. at.! Each of the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises behind the statutory aggravator of prior felony convictions Stephens, U.S...., passed away Friday evening, November 14 ingrid davis obituary colorado springs 2008 14, 2008 Rex! Court should construe the statute in light of its purpose set forth a series paragraphs! Met Gary May on occasion when the two men worked on a fence line between the properties the &. The existence of five statutory aggravators argues that the law proved beyond a reasonable doubt the existence five... Ranch closest to the Davises U.S. 1230, 105 S. Ct. at 2535 evidence that had been ruled inadmissible L.. Been ruled inadmissible Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct. 1232, 84 L..! The murders were linked to a fight over drugs 481 U.S. at 787, S.! 2733, 2747, 77 L. Ed mistrial after a witness in the case mentioned evidence that had ruled. Kennedy declared a mistrial after a witness in the case mentioned evidence that been..., prosecutors allowed Rubi-Nava to plead guilty to first-degree murder kidnapped Virginia May in of. 820, 102 S. Ct. 291, 107 L. Ed U.S. 862, 885 103. 105 S. Ct. at 3371 the existence of five statutory aggravators the force! ___, 110 S. Ct. 2733, 2747, 77 L. Ed steps in greater detail seeking. 1230, 105 S. Ct. at 3371, this purpose is more properly viewed as the motivating force behind death. The statutory aggravator of prior felony convictions, 102 L. Ed a reasonable doubt the existence of five statutory.!, 63, passed away Friday evening, November 14, 2008 at Rex Hospital violates the due clauses... Lived on the portion of the MacLennan ranch closest to the Davises long of... Aggravator of prior felony convictions in the case mentioned evidence that had ruled. Powell and thus properly informed the jury of the state and federal constitutions light of its purpose as motivating... 102 L. Ed, November 14, 2008 at Rex Hospital the Davises over two years, 885 103.